Skin CancerAdvanced · 7 min read

Lentigo Maligna and Lentigo Maligna Melanoma

Facial chronically sun-damaged skin produces lentigo maligna with follicle-centered features (asymmetric pigmented follicles, gray circles, rhomboidal structures) that progress through a defined four-stage model, requiring an inverse-approach diagnostic strategy and staged surgical mapping.

By Dr. Yehonatan KaplanPublished Updated

In brief

Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) develop on chronically sun-damaged facial skin where the dermoepidermal junction is anatomically flattened. Pigment network is therefore rare, and instead the diagnostic vocabulary centers on the follicular openings: pigment that invades, distorts, or surrounds the follicles produces the cardinal LM features. Discrimination from pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK) and solar lentigo / flat seborrheic keratosis (SL/SK) is the central clinical challenge because all three entities share most pigmented criteria. The inverse approach (look for benign-defining features and exclude them) plus surgical mapping with rush permanent sections or MART-1 immunohistochemistry define modern LM management.

Clinical content

01The LM progression model articulates four sequential dermoscopic features. First, gray dots (corresponding to single melanocytes or melanin within macrophages) develop as the earliest sign. Second, the dots aggregate into gray globules. Third, asymmetrically pigmented follicular openings appear as the proliferation invades the hair follicle epithelium. Fourth, rhomboidal structures (gray-brown lines that connect pigmented follicles into polygonal patterns) develop as confluent perifollicular pigment forms quadrilateral connections. In late LM and LMM, follicular openings are obliterated by pigment, blue-white veil and atypical vessels appear, and the lesion enters vertical-growth phase.

02Annular-granular pattern describes confluent gray dots arranged in a ring around follicular openings. This pattern is the dermoscopic equivalent of single-cell melanocyte proliferation along the rete ridges with melanin uptake by upper-dermal macrophages. It is classically described in LM but overlaps with pigmented actinic keratosis and pigmented solar lentigo, making it sensitive but not specific.

03Asymmetrically pigmented follicular openings are arguably the most specific LM feature. A normal follicular opening on facial skin shows a small pigment ring of uniform thickness or no pigment at all. In LM the ring becomes asymmetric, thicker on one side, sometimes with pigment extending into the follicular ostium. The hypothesis that LM may originate from cancer stem cells of the hair-follicle bulge rather than from epidermal melanocytes is consistent with this folliculocentric pattern.

04Rhomboidal structures (also called rhomboid lines or polygons) are gray-brown lines connecting pigmented follicular openings into quadrilateral or polygonal shapes. They reflect confluent perifollicular and interfollicular junctional melanocytic proliferation. Lallas's multicenter study identified gray rhomboidal lines as the single strongest dermoscopic predictor of LM (sixfold odds) but only present in 56% of LMs, so their absence does not exclude diagnosis.

05Gray circles (small gray rings within follicular openings) and gray peppering (annular granular dots) are the early features that may appear before rhomboidal structures form. Tschandl identified gray circles as the most specific isolated LM finding. In Lallas's analysis, grey circles posed a 5.9-fold univariate increased probability of LM, though the multivariate model favored rhomboidal lines.

06The target-like pattern describes a follicular opening with a central dark dot or globule surrounded by a brown halo, sometimes with an outer gray ring. It represents pigment within the follicular ostium plus perifollicular pigment. This pattern is uncommon but quite specific for LM when distinguishable from the targetoid follicles of PAK (which have central yellow keratotic plug and white outer halo).

07Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) correlates with dermoscopic features. Pagetoid round cells around follicles correspond to gray circles, atypical junctional thickening corresponds to rhomboidal structures, and dermal melanophages correspond to gray peppering. RCM raises diagnostic accuracy when added to dermoscopy and is increasingly used to map LM borders preoperatively.

08Lentigo maligna borders are notoriously difficult to delineate clinically. Surgical management therefore relies on staged excision techniques. Mohs micrographic surgery with rush permanent sections (square procedure or slow Mohs) allows comprehensive peripheral evaluation while overcoming the difficulty of identifying single atypical melanocytes on frozen sections. MART-1 (Melan-A) immunohistochemistry on permanent sections is now the standard adjunct, dramatically improving sensitivity for residual atypical melanocytes at the surgical margin compared with H&E alone.

09Desmoplastic melanoma represents a distinct LMM subtype that is often amelanotic or hypomelanotic. The lesions appear as scar-like indurated plaques on chronically sun-damaged skin, with a male predominance (1.75:1) and a mean Breslow thickness around 3.7 mm in Pampena's systematic review. Dermoscopically, white shiny streaks, milky-red areas, regression structures, and atypical polymorphic and linear-irregular vessels dominate. Desmoplastic melanoma has higher local recurrence rates and distinct staging considerations (lower sentinel-lymph-node positivity in pure desmoplastic lesions).

Key dermoscopic features

Gray dots (annular-granular)
Earliest LM sign; single melanocytes plus dermal melanophagesGray-blue dots and granules forming rings around follicular openings or scattered through the lesion
Asymmetric pigmented follicular openings
Tumor invading hair follicle epithelium; folliculocentric originPigment ring of unequal thickness around the follicular ostium, sometimes extending into the lumen
Rhomboidal structures
Strongest single LM predictor (sixfold odds in multivariate analysis)Gray-brown lines connecting pigmented follicular openings into rhomboid or polygonal shapes
Gray circles around follicles
Specific early LM clue; melanocytes within follicular epitheliumSmall gray ring inside the follicular opening (at least three required to score positive)
Target-like pattern
Pigment within follicular ostium plus perifollicular ringFollicle with central dark globule, brown halo, and sometimes outer gray ring
Obliterated follicles
Late-stage LM/LMM with confluent pigmentPigmentation invading and obscuring follicular openings; nonevident follicles characterize 71% of LMs
Black-blue homogeneous areas
Vertical-growth phase or invasive LMMStructureless dark blue or black zones, often eccentric, with overlying ground-glass haze
White shiny streaks
Dermal fibrosis, common in desmoplastic LMMPolarization-only short white lines orthogonal to one another
Increased vascular density
Late LM/LMM angiogenesisLinear or red rhomboidal vessels in the interfollicular space, sometimes with milky-red areas
Pseudonetwork
Site-specific facial appearance, non-specific between LM, nevus, and lentigoDiffuse brown pigmentation interrupted by hypopigmented follicular openings

High yield clinical points15 pearls in 3 groups

Recognition & pattern analysis

8 points
1
Network does not exist on facial skin. The flattened dermoepidermal junction of facial skin produces pseudonetwork (diffuse pigment with hypopigmented follicular openings) instead of true network. Diagnostic reasoning on the face must center on follicles, not network.
2
Schiffner's four-step progression model. Gray dots, then gray globules, then asymmetric follicles, then rhomboidal structures defines the classical LM evolution. Recognize where on this sequence a given lesion sits to estimate biological behavior.
OR 6.18
Rhomboidal lines = strongest single LM clue. In Lallas's multicenter regression analysis, gray rhomboidal lines were the only dermoscopic feature retaining strong predictive value for LM in multivariate analysis (OR 6.18). They are present in roughly half of LMs.
71%
Nonevident follicles favor LM. When pigment obscures the follicular openings, the lesion is statistically four times more likely to be LM than PAK (which keeps its follicles visible and white-circled). Non-evident follicles characterize 71% of LMs.
5
White circles are the strongest PAK clue. Targetoid follicles with central yellow keratotic core and white outer halo gave a 13-fold probability of PAK in Lallas's series. Detection of white circles makes LM very unlikely on the same lesion.
73%
Scales and red color shift toward PAK. Surface scaling is present in 73% of PAKs but only 16% of LMs. Erythema gave a 3.6-fold PAK probability. Both are simple bedside discriminators when LM rhomboids are equivocal.
7
RCM raises preoperative accuracy. Reflectance confocal microscopy identifies pagetoid round cells, junctional atypical melanocytes, and dermal melanophages corresponding to dermoscopic features. RCM is now used preoperatively for border mapping in selected centers.
8
Solitary LM versus freckled background. Roughly half of LMs occur as solitary lesions on otherwise non-freckled facial skin, while the other half arise on backgrounds of multiple lentigines. Solitary lesions are easier to identify by ugly-duckling principles; lesions on freckled backgrounds require pattern-comparison vigilance.

Pitfalls & mimics

2 points
1
Inverse approach for facial pigmented lesions. Because LM features are subtle and overlap with PAK and SL/SK, diagnose by exclusion: if the lesion lacks SL/SK clues (parallel/reticular brown lines, sharp border, milia-like cysts, comedo-like openings, brain-like pattern) and lacks PAK clues (white circles, scales, red color, wide non-pigmented follicles, erythema), consider LM even without classical positive findings.
2
Desmoplastic melanoma is amelanotic and indurated. DM presents as scar-like firm plaques on chronically sun-damaged skin, often missed clinically. Mean Breslow thickness 3.7 mm at diagnosis. White shiny streaks, milky-red areas, regression, and polymorphic vessels are the dermoscopic clues.

When to biopsy

5 points
1
Heavy pigmentation in a flat facial lesion is concerning. Lesions clinically rated heavily pigmented carried a 2-fold increased LM probability. Combined with absent follicles and gray rhomboids, heavy pigmentation triggers excision.
2
Gray color is the dermoscopic alarm color of the face. Any gray color (dots, circles, rhomboidal lines, structureless gray) on a facial pigmented macule is the screening trigger for LM, even though specificity is imperfect. Gray dictates biopsy when other clues are equivocal.
3
MART-1 immunostain on permanent sections. MART-1 (Melan-A) immunohistochemistry dramatically improves identification of single atypical melanocytes at surgical margins compared with H&E. Most centers performing staged excision now routinely incorporate MART-1, reducing positive-margin rates and recurrence.
14-50%
Staged excision (square procedure or slow Mohs). Because LM borders are subclinical, conventional excision with 5 mm margins leaves residual tumor in roughly 14-50% of cases depending on lesion size and histopathologic subtype. Staged excision with rush permanent sections allows complete peripheral evaluation and achieves clearance rates over 95% in published series.
5
Pure versus mixed desmoplastic melanoma. Pure DM has lower sentinel-lymph-node positivity than mixed DM, influencing staging decisions. The distinction is histopathologic but worth knowing because it changes prognosis and management.

Lectures covering this topic17 lectures

Notable updates & conceptual milestones6 updates

Schiffner four-step progression model

2000

Defined the sequential dermoscopic features (gray dots, gray globules, asymmetric follicles, rhomboidal structures) that correspond to LM histopathologic evolution and remain the teaching standard.

Inverse approach for facial pigmented lesions

2021

Lallas 2021 demonstrated that diagnosing LM by excluding prevailing benign features (parallel/reticular brown lines, sharp border, comedo-like openings for SL/SK; white circles, scales, red color, erythema for PAK) significantly improves human-reader sensitivity over feature-positive criteria alone.

MART-1 immunohistochemistry on staged excision

2010

Shifted the standard for histopathologic margin assessment in LM by enabling reliable identification of single atypical melanocytes that are invisible on frozen sections, supporting staged excision techniques.

Reflectance confocal microscopy for border mapping

2015

RCM provides cellular-resolution imaging that correlates with dermoscopic features and enables non-invasive mapping of subclinical LM extension before surgery.

Cancer stem cell hypothesis of LM origin

2008

Zalaudek proposed that LM arises from melanocytic stem cells in the hair-follicle bulge rather than from interfollicular epidermal melanocytes, providing a biological framework for the folliculocentric dermoscopic features.

Zoom-in and fluorescence-advanced videodermatoscopy

2025

High-magnification dermoscopy (150x) and fluorescence-advanced videodermatoscopy can show roundish and dendritic melanocyte morphology in LM, with asymmetric pigmented follicular openings present across study lesions, helping reduce unnecessary biopsies on facial sites.

Bottom line

Facial chronically sun-damaged skin produces lentigo maligna with follicle-centered features (asymmetric pigmented follicles, gray circles, rhomboidal structures) that progress through a defined four-stage model, requiring an inverse-approach diagnostic strategy and staged surgical mapping.

15 clinical points · 6 recent updates · 10 references

References

Sources cited in the lecture content or that underpin the clinical points above. Verify with primary sources before practice changes.

  1. [1]
    Lallas A, Tschandl P, Kyrgidis A, et al. Dermoscopic clues to differentiate facial lentigo maligna from pigmented actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol 2016;174:1079-1085.
    PubMed: 26784739DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14355· Multicenter regression analysis identifying rhomboidal lines, non-evident follicles, and intense pigmentation as LM predictors versus white circles and scales for PAK.
  2. [2]
    Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Vogt T, et al. Improvement of early recognition of lentigo maligna using dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:25-32.
    PubMed: 10607316DOI: 10.1016/S0190-9622(00)90005-7· Original four-step progression model for LM dermoscopic features.
  3. [3]
    Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Kittler H. Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015;29:120-127.
    PubMed: 24661420DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12483· Identified gray circles as a specific LM clue.
  4. [4]
    Lallas A, Lallas K, Tschandl P, et al. The dermoscopic inverse approach significantly improves the accuracy of human readers for lentigo maligna diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021;84:381-389.
    PubMed: 32592885DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.046· Validated the inverse-approach diagnostic strategy for facial pigmented lesions.
  5. [5]
    Pampena R, Lai M, Lombardi M, et al. Clinical and dermoscopic features associated with difficult-to-recognize variants of cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol 2020;156:430-439.
    PubMed: 32101255DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4912· Systematic review including 71 desmoplastic melanomas with mean Breslow 3.7 mm and characteristic dermoscopic features.
  6. [6]
    Pralong P, Bathelier E, Dalle S, Poulalhon N, Debarbieux S, Thomas L. Dermoscopy of lentigo maligna melanoma: report of 125 cases. Br J Dermatol 2012;167:280-287.
    PubMed: 22404578DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10932.x· Largest single-center LMM series with vascular criteria including red rhomboidal structures.
  7. [7]
    DeWane ME, Kelsey A, Oliviero M, Rabinovitz H, Grant-Kels JM. Melanoma on chronically sun-damaged skin: lentigo maligna and desmoplastic melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;81:823-833.
    PubMed: 30930085DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.066· Clinical and dermoscopic review of LM and desmoplastic melanoma management.
  8. [8]
    Cánovas Seva C, Martínez Leboráns L, Batalla A, Sánchez-Aguilar Y Rojas MD, Flórez Á. Lentigo Maligna: Contemporary Surgical Management and Outcome: A Review. Ann Ital Chir. 2026;97(1):36-62.
    PubMed: 41537210DOI: 10.62713/aic.4228· 2026 review: Mohs achieves 0-3% LM recurrence at 5 years versus 5.7-27.3% for wide local excision; initial 5 mm clinical margins commonly extend to 7-12 mm to clear.
  9. [9]
    Mansilla-Polo M, Morgado-Carrasco D, Toll A. Review on the Role of Paraffin-embedded Margin-controlled Mohs Micrographic Surgery to Treat Skin Tumors. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2024;115(6):555-571.
    PubMed: 38395222DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2024.02.017· Slow Mohs (Tubingen, spaghetti) improves recurrence and survival in LM versus WLE, especially with immunohistochemistry on facial lesions.
  10. [10]
    D'Onghia M, Falcinelli F, Barbarossa L, et al. Zoom-in Dermoscopy for Facial Tumors. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15(3):324.
    PubMed: 39941253DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030324· High-magnification (150x) and fluorescence-advanced videodermatoscopy show melanocyte morphology and asymmetric pigmented follicular openings in LM.